1 Faculty of Commerce and Management, Kalinga University, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-Commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.
The present study aims at investigating the effect of implementing artificial intelligence through chatbots in the management accounting practices of accounting professionals and accounting students. This study intends to explore determinants of ChatGPT usage that involve PU of behavioural accounting, the effect of trust (TR) on accounting professionals and accounting students, and the potential moderating role of age and gender in ChatGPT usage. This study advances our understanding of the adoption of ChatGPT in more detail. The study applied the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model paradigm, incorporating factors like social value (SV), monetary value (MV), emotional value (EV), quality value (QV) and TR. Data was collected as primary data involving 435 accounting professionals and students via online/offline closed-ended structured questionnaire surveys using a convenience sampling technique. This research was carried out between 23rd January and 23rd August. Hypotheses were tested, and empirical validation of the conceptual model was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences and moderation analysis was done using Smart PLS 4. It was found out that factors such as effort expectancy, MV, EV, QV and TR had a great influence on the management intent behavioural intention. However, there were no statistically significant implications for factors like performance expectancy and SV. This is how accounting professionals and accounting students can take advantage of the findings of this research. The reason for this is to effectively integrate ChatGPT into the domain of accounting and manage the implementation to enhance performance in management accounting practices. These aspects are essential when it comes to the implementation of artificial intelligence. The study is relevant to business, educational institutions and government sectors since it focuses on ChatGPT adoption.
Technology adoption, artificial intelligence, managerial accounting, UTAUT2 model, behavioural intention
Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2017). How ChatGPT will change the way we make decisions. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2017/07/how-ai-will-change-the-way-we-make-decisions
Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2017). Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.002
Alhwaiti, M. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence application in the post-COvid era and its impact on faculty members’ occupational well-being and teaching self efficacy: A path analysis using the UTAUT 2 model. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2175110
Alkhwaldi, A. F., & Abdulmuhsin, A. A. (2021). Crisis-centric distance learning model in Jordanian higher education sector: Factors influencing the continuous use of distance learning platforms during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of International Education in Business, 15(2), 250–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-01-2021-0001
Baabdullah A. M., Alalwan A. A., Rana N. P., Kizgin H., & Patil P. (2019). Consumer use of mobile banking (M-Banking) in Saudi Arabia: Towards an integrated model. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 38–52.
Baptista G., & Oliveira T. (2015). Understanding mobile banking: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 418–430.
Balachandran, M. (1985). Behavioral accounting. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 4(2–3), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1300/j103v04n02_03
Birnberg, J. G. (1973). Empirical research in behavioral accounting. Management International Review, 13(2/3), 71–77. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40226230
Birnberg, J. G. (2011). A proposed framework for behavioral accounting research. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 23(1), 1–43.
Birnberg, J. G., & Shields, J. F. (1989). Three decades of behavioral accounting research: A search for order. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1, 23–74.
Boonsiritomachai, W., & Pitchayadejanant, K. (2017). Determinants affecting mobile banking adoption by generation Y based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model modified by the technology acceptance model concept. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.10.005
Brock, J. K., & Von Wangenheim, F. (2019). Demystifying ChatGPT: What digital transformation leaders can teach you about realistic artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 110–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504219865226
Burton, J. W., Stein, M. K., & Jensen, T. B. (2019). A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision-making. Journal of Behavioral Decision-Making, 33(2), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2155
Cao, G., Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Understanding managers’ attitudes and managerial intentions towards using artificial intelligence for organizational decision-making. Technovation, 106, 102312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102312
Caplan, E. H. (1989). Behavioral accounting—A personal view. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1, 109.
Caputo, F., Cillo, V., Candelo, E., & Liu, Y. (2019). Innovating through digital revolution. Management Decision, 57(8), 2032–2051. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-07-2018-0833
Casey, T., & Wilson-Evered, E. (2012). Predicting uptake of technology innovations in online family dispute resolution services: An application and extension of the UTAUT. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2034–2045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.022
Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Khorana, S., Mikalef, P., & Sharma, A. (2021). Assessing organizational users’ intentions and behavior to ChatGPT integrated CRM systems: A meta-UTAUT approach. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10181-1
Chowdhury, S., Budhwar, P., Dey, P. K., Joel-Edgar, S., & Abadie, A. (2022). ChatGPT-employee collaboration and business performance: Integrating knowledge-based view, socio-technical systems and organisational socialisation framework. Journal of Business Research, 144, 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.069
Dahlberg, T., Guo, J., & Ondrus, J. (2015). A critical review of mobile payment research. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(5), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2015.07.006
Davenport, T. H., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2019). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0
Deb, M., & Lomo-David, E. (2014). An empirical examination of customers’ adoption of m-banking in India. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 32(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-07-2013-0119
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299706100203
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision-making in the era of Big Data—Evolution, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2017). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J. S., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., . . . Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence (ChatGPT): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Elliott, R. K. (1971). Aspects of behavioral accounting. Journal of Accountancy (Pre-1986), 131, 63.
European Commission. (2020). White paper on artificial intelligence: A European approach to excellence and trust. In European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence-european-approach-excellence-and-trust_en
Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2018). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 28(4), 854–887.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
Gharrah, A. S. A., & Aljaafreh, A. (2021). Why students use social networks for education: Extension of UTAUT2. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1081
Giovanis, A., Assimakopoulos, C., & Sarmaniotis, C. (2019). Adoption of mobile self-service retail banking technologies. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 47(9), 894–914. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-05-2018-0089
Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 265–275.
Gupta, K. P., Manrai, R., & Goel, U. (2019). Factors influencing adoption of payments banks by Indian customers: Extending UTAUT with perceived credibility. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 13(2), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/jabs-07-2017-0111
Gursoy, D., Hengxuan, O., Lu, L., & Nunkoo, R. (2019). Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (ChatGPT) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008
Haesevoets, T., De Cremer, D., Dierckx, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2021). Human-machine collaboration in managerial decision-making. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106730
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
Huang, C. Y., & Kao, Y. S. (2015). UTAUT2 based predictions of factors influencing the technology acceptance of phablets by DNP. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/603747
Johnson, D. G., & Verdicchio, M. (2017). ChatGPT anxiety. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2267–2270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23867
Jovanovic, M., Sjödin, D., & Parida, V. (2022). Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: Expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms. Technovation, 118, 102218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102218
Kwateng, K. O., Atiemo, K. a. O., & Appiah, C. (2019). Acceptance and use of mobile banking: An application of UTAUT2. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(1), 118–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-03-2018-0055
Malone, T. W. (2018). How human-computer ‘Superminds’ are redefining the future of work. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-human-computer-superminds-are-redefining-the-future-of-work/#:~:text=All%20superminds%20have%20a%20kind,physical%2C%20activities%20of%20these%20groups
Metcalf, L. E., Askay, D. A., & Rosenberg, L. (2019). Keeping humans in the loop: Pooling knowledge through artificial swarm intelligence to improve business decision-making. California Management Review, 61(4), 84–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619862256
Moorthy, K., Yee, T. T., T’ing, L. C., & Kumaran, V. V. (2019). Habit and hedonic motivation are the strongest influences in mobile learning behaviours among higher education students in Malaysia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4432
Nguyen, T., Nguyen, T. M., Pham, Q. T., & Misra, S. (2014). Acceptance and use of E-learning based on cloud computing: The role of consumer innovativeness (pp. 159–174). Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09156-3_12
Nikolopoulou, K., Gialamas, V., & Lavidas, K. (2020). Acceptance of mobile phone by university students for their studies: An investigation applying UTAUT2 model. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4139–4155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10157-9
Oliveira, T., Faria, M., Thomas, M. A., & Popovi?, A. (2014). Extending the understanding of mobile banking adoption: When UTAUT meets TTF and ITM. International Journal of Information Management, 34(5), 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.06.004
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/3150499
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Rampersad, G. (2020). Robot will take your job: Innovation for an era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Business Research, 116, 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.019
Sankaran, R., & Chakraborty, S. (2020). Why customers make mobile payments? Applying a means-end chain approach. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-12-2019-0622
Sankaran, R., & Chakraborty, S. (2022). Factors impacting mobile banking in India: Empirical approach extending UTAUT2 with perceived value and trust. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 11(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/2277975220975219
Seeber, I., Waizenegger, L., Seidel, S., Morana, S., Benbasat, I., & Lowry, P. B. (2020). Collaborating with technology-based autonomous agents. Internet Research, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-12-2019-0503
Shen, C.-C., & Chuang, H.-M. (2010). Exploring users’ attitudes and intentions toward the interactive whiteboard technology environment. International Review on Computers and Software, 5, 200–208.
Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & Von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619862257
Sweeney, J., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4359(01)00041-0
Upadhyay, N., Upadhyay, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Theorizing artificial intelligence acceptance and digital entrepreneurship model. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 28(5), 1138–1166. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-01-2021-0052
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36(1), 157. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/41410412
Verdegem, P., & De Marez, L. (2011). Rethinking determinants of ICT acceptance: Towards an integrated and comprehensive overview. Technovation, 31(8), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.02.004
Wamba-Taguimdje, S., Wamba, S. F., Kamdjoug, J. R. K., & Wanko, C. E. T. (2020). Influence of artificial intelligence (ChatGPT) on firm performance: The business value of ChatGPT-based transformation projects. Business Process Management Journal, 26(7), 1893–1924. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-10-2019-0411
Wang, N., Pynadath, D. V., & Hill, S. C. (2016). Trust calibration within a human-robot team: Comparing automatically generated explanations. 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). https://doi.org/10.1109/hri.2016.7451741
Weld, D. S., & Bansal, G. (2019). The challenge of crafting intelligible intelligence. Communications of the ACM, 62(6), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/3282486
Wu, K., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q., Tan, X., & Zheng, H. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004
Yadav, A., Gupta, V., Sahu, H., & Shrimal, S. (2017). Artificial intelligence—New era. International Journal of New Technology and Research (IJNTR), 3(3), 30–33.
Zhou, T., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 760–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.013
Zhou, M., Dzingirai, C., Hove, K., Chitata, T., & Mugandani, R. (2022). Adoption, use and enhancement of virtual learning during COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 8939–8959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10985-x